As the federal government shutdown stretches on, President Donald Trump has turned it into what he calls an “opportunity” to reshape federal spending. He’s described the moment as a chance to eliminate “giveaways, welfare programs” and what he labels “Democrat programs” that Republicans “never wanted.” Now, those words are becoming policy.

The administration’s 2026 budget proposal includes deep cuts across dozens of agencies — but nowhere is the knife sharper than in housing. The plan envisions a roughly 44% reduction to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), dropping its budget from about $77 billion to $43 billion, according to CRE Daily.

Officials frame this as fiscal discipline and decentralization — moving “power back to the states.” But for millions of renters, especially those relying on Section 8 vouchers or public housing, the proposal could mean the loss of a home.

---

What’s on the Chopping Block

The HUD cuts are part of a larger proposal that would eliminate or restructure at least 40 federal programs, according to PBS NewsHour. Instead of direct federal support, the administration proposes a State Rental Assistance Block Grant — essentially shifting control of rental aid to state governments.

That change might sound bureaucratic, but the consequences are enormous. The Urban Institute estimates that such a shift could reduce the number of households receiving rental assistance from 4.5 million to 2.4 million — a loss of over two million households.

Programs on the potential chopping block include:

• Tenant-based rental assistance, which funds Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers.
• Project-based rental assistance for private landlords who rent to low-income tenants.
• Public housing operations and maintenance funds.
• Housing for the elderly and persons with disabilities.
• Homeless assistance grants and community-development initiatives.

The National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials warns that such reductions would “devastate local housing authorities and increase homelessness nationwide.”

---

Why Housing Is at the Heart of the Fight

Housing policy may not dominate headlines like immigration or foreign affairs, but its impact is immediate and deeply personal. When budgets tighten, housing is often the first safety net to tear.

A Washington Post analysis found that the proposed cuts would hit both tenant- and project-based assistance, threatening programs for seniors, people with disabilities, and low-income families. If enacted, thousands of landlords might pull out of the Section 8 program, shrinking an already tight supply of affordable rentals.

This concern is echoed by housing authorities across the country. In New York City, the NYCHA says funding could be cut by as much as 45%, a move local officials warn would halt maintenance, delay repairs, and leave aging buildings “uninhabitable within years.”

And the strain isn’t just urban. In smaller cities and rural areas, where public housing is limited and private rental markets are tight, losing vouchers could push families directly into homelessness.

---

The Shutdown Effect — and What It Means for Section 8

The timing of these cuts collides with the ongoing government shutdown, which has already delayed payments to housing agencies. AP News reports that the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and other aid programs remain “safe through October” — but housing funds are less protected. If the shutdown continues, voucher payments to landlords could stall, putting families at risk of eviction.

For renters and landlords navigating this uncertainty, our own post — “What’s the shutdown doing to Section 8 & affordable housing?” — breaks down how voucher funding freezes ripple through local markets. The short version: when HUD stops paying, landlords panic, and families lose stability.

These new budget cuts would extend that disruption indefinitely.

---

“Ending Giveaways” or Eroding Protections?

Trump and his budget team frame these changes as a move toward efficiency. In their words, shifting funds to the states will “empower local governments” and “end wasteful Washington bureaucracy.” But housing experts see something else: the dismantling of a decades-old safety net.

The National Low Income Housing Coalition called the proposal “one of the most devastating housing budgets ever released,” noting that block grants lack the legal guardrails that protect tenants under federal programs. Without those, states could alter eligibility, cut benefits, or divert funds entirely.

Critics also highlight that housing cuts ripple beyond renters. Public-housing authorities rely on consistent federal capital funding to maintain buildings. When that dries up, disrepair accelerates, and entire developments can become unlivable — something the Trump administration has already seen as it halted a billion-dollar maintenance initiative.

---

What Programs Are Being Cut Beyond Housing

While housing takes the hardest hit, it’s not the only sector on the line.

In addition to housing-aid risks, the ongoing shutdown is also threatening food-security supports like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has warned states that there are “insufficient funds” to cover full November 2025 benefits if the shutdown persists, and several states have already paused issuance of payments for that month. This puts households relying on both food aid and housing assistance in a doubly-vulnerable position. For a deeper dive into what this means specifically for voucher recipients, check out our post on SNAP impacts: “SNAP Benefits on Hold for November 2025 — What It Means for Section 8”.

Budget experts at FactCheck.org say the pattern is clear: Trump aims to dramatically shrink federal anti-poverty spending, while avoiding direct cuts to politically sensitive entitlements like Medicare and Social Security.

---

States May Gain Power — But Lose Accountability

Supporters of the new budget argue that housing assistance works best when it’s local. They claim that states can design programs more tailored to their residents, without what they call “Washington micromanagement.”

But history offers reasons for caution. Past block-grant experiments, such as the conversion of welfare into the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program in the 1990s, showed that states often used funds for unrelated purposes. As a result, cash assistance to poor families fell by over 60% nationally.

If the same model is applied to rental assistance, experts warn, it could create 50 different housing systems with uneven rules and unpredictable funding — effectively ending a national guarantee of housing help for the most vulnerable.

---

The Broader Housing Crisis

These proposed cuts arrive amid one of the worst housing crises in decades. Nationwide, rents have climbed by more than 25% since 2020, and homelessness has reached record levels. Developers face construction-cost spikes, while local governments struggle to meet affordable-housing goals.

At the same time, existing federal housing infrastructure is crumbling. A Housing Finance magazine report found that HUD’s public-housing backlog already exceeds $80 billion in deferred repairs — a figure that would balloon if maintenance funding is cut.

And while the administration argues that private-market solutions will fill the gap, even pro-market economists note that the private sector rarely builds or maintains deeply affordable units without subsidies.

---

What Happens Next

The budget proposal still faces congressional review, and many of its most aggressive cuts could be softened or blocked entirely. But even as a statement of intent, it signals a sharp turn in federal housing policy — from protection to retrenchment.

Housing advocates are mobilizing fast. The NLIHC, NAHRO, and other coalitions are urging Congress to preserve key HUD programs, while cities prepare for worst-case scenarios.

For renters, the next few months could determine whether the safety net survives in recognizable form. If housing assistance is block-granted to states — and funding slashed by nearly half — millions may find themselves navigating a new system that looks far less secure, and far less fair.

---

The Bottom Line

President Trump’s plan to “cut programs permanently” isn’t just about abstract budgets — it’s about homes, communities, and families. The administration frames the move as fiscal discipline; housing advocates call it demolition.

Either way, housing is now ground zero in America’s new austerity politics. For the tens of millions who depend on federal support to stay sheltered, the stakes couldn’t be higher.